Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CITY LEWISVILLE 2026-04-26 12:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CITY LEWISVILLE
CCN 450669 | TX | 161 beds | Current EBITDA $40.2M → Pro Forma $50.7M (+$10.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$197.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$40.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$50.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$10.4M
Modeled Uplift
$7.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.1M (vs $10.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$127K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.0M$4.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.8M$109K$3.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$607K$1.8M$2.4M$7.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$127K$127K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$990K$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$980K$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$803K$1.6M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$63K$127K$127K$127K$127K$127K$127K
Cumulative$0$2.8M$5.7M$8.4M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$40.2M$40.2M20.3%
Year 1$41.5M+$6.9M$48.4M24.5%
Year 2$42.7M+$10.4M$53.1M26.8%
Year 3$44.0M+$10.4M$54.4M27.5%
Year 4$45.3M+$10.4M$55.7M28.1%
Year 5$46.7M+$10.4M$57.1M28.8%
$402.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$627.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$225.3M
Value Created
$57.1M
Exit EBITDA
$64.1M
Organic Growth
$104.1M
RCM Value Creation
$57.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Clean Claim Rate$63K$95K$127K$152K
Total$5.2M$7.8M$10.4M$12.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 160 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.3%-9.0%2.6%14.6%
P86
Net-to-Gross11.7%14.0%21.1%30.8%
P15
Occupancy58.6%48.3%63.9%73.9%
P43
Rev/Bed$1.2M$387K$1.0M$1.5M
P62
Exp/Bed$979K$437K$965K$1.3M
P51

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML