Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CITY PLANO 2026-04-26 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CITY PLANO
CCN 450651 | TX | 573 beds | Current EBITDA $377.8M → Pro Forma $427.1M (+$49.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$936.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$377.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$49.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$427.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$35.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$49.3M
Modeled Uplift
$34.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$15.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $34.3M (vs $49.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$18.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$18.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$11.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$600K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$49.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$18.7M$18.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$18.0M$515K$18.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.9M$8.5M$11.4M$35.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$600K$600K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.7M$9.4M$14.1M$18.7M$18.7M$18.7M$18.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.6M$9.3M$13.9M$18.5M$18.5M$18.5M$18.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.8M$7.6M$11.4M$11.4M$11.4M$11.4M$11.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$300K$600K$600K$600K$600K$600K$600K
Cumulative$0$13.4M$26.8M$40.0M$49.3M$49.3M$49.3M$49.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $49.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
9.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
10.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
11.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x
12.0x25% / 3.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.4x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.0x
Headroom (turns)
-15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.5x, adding 1.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$377.8M$377.8M40.3%
Year 1$389.1M+$32.9M$422.0M45.0%
Year 2$400.8M+$49.3M$450.1M48.0%
Year 3$412.8M+$49.3M$462.1M49.3%
Year 4$425.2M+$49.3M$474.5M50.6%
Year 5$437.9M+$49.3M$487.2M52.0%
$3.78B
Entry EV (10x)
$5.36B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.58B
Value Created
$487.2M
Exit EBITDA
$601.7M
Organic Growth
$492.9M
RCM Value Creation
$487.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$9.4M$14.1M$18.7M$22.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$9.3M$13.9M$18.5M$22.3M
A/R Days Reduction$5.7M$8.5M$11.4M$13.7M
Clean Claim Rate$300K$450K$600K$719K
Total$24.6M$37.0M$49.3M$59.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 65 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin40.3%-17.0%4.1%13.1%
P95
Net-to-Gross12.3%12.7%18.0%25.2%
P22
Occupancy78.3%65.6%71.5%80.2%
P68
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
P69
Exp/Bed$976K$994K$1.4M$1.9M
P22

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML