Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TEXAS HEALTH H-E-B 2026-04-26 15:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TEXAS HEALTH H-E-B
CCN 450639 | TX | 195 beds | Current EBITDA $3.7M → Pro Forma $19.0M (+$15.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$291.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$19.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$15.3M
Modeled Uplift
$11.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.0M (vs $15.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$186K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.8M$5.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.6M$160K$5.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$894K$2.7M$3.5M$11.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$186K$186K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$93K$186K$186K$186K$186K$186K$186K
Cumulative$0$4.2M$8.3M$12.4M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x104% / 35.6x109% / 39.9x113% / 44.2x115% / 46.3x117% / 48.5x
9.0x99% / 31.2x104% / 35.1x108% / 38.9x110% / 40.8x112% / 42.8x
10.0x94% / 27.8x99% / 31.2x103% / 34.7x105% / 36.4x107% / 38.1x
11.0x90% / 25.0x95% / 28.1x99% / 31.2x101% / 32.8x103% / 34.4x
12.0x87% / 22.6x91% / 25.5x95% / 28.4x97% / 29.8x99% / 31.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.9x
Headroom (turns)
75%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 75% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.6x, adding 6.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.7M$3.7M1.3%
Year 1$3.8M+$10.2M$14.0M4.8%
Year 2$3.9M+$15.3M$19.2M6.6%
Year 3$4.0M+$15.3M$19.4M6.6%
Year 4$4.2M+$15.3M$19.5M6.7%
Year 5$4.3M+$15.3M$19.6M6.7%
$36.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$215.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$178.7M
Value Created
$19.6M
Exit EBITDA
$5.9M
Organic Growth
$153.2M
RCM Value Creation
$19.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.9M$4.4M$5.8M$7.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$6.9M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.7M$3.5M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$93K$140K$186K$224K
Total$7.7M$11.5M$15.3M$18.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 149 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.3%-8.3%4.0%13.7%
P42
Net-to-Gross26.6%13.6%18.9%28.5%
P70
Occupancy75.4%49.4%64.5%73.9%
P78
Rev/Bed$1.5M$605K$1.2M$1.5M
P76
Exp/Bed$1.5M$610K$1.0M$1.4M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML