Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CITY DENTON 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CITY DENTON
CCN 450634 | TX | 195 beds | Current EBITDA $59.0M → Pro Forma $72.3M (+$13.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$253.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$59.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$72.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$13.3M
Modeled Uplift
$9.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.5M (vs $13.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$162K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.1M$5.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.9M$139K$5.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$778K$2.3M$3.1M$9.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$162K$162K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$81K$162K$162K$162K$162K$162K$162K
Cumulative$0$3.6M$7.3M$10.8M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x
10.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x
11.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
12.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$59.0M$59.0M23.3%
Year 1$60.8M+$8.9M$69.7M27.5%
Year 2$62.6M+$13.3M$75.9M30.0%
Year 3$64.5M+$13.3M$77.8M30.7%
Year 4$66.4M+$13.3M$79.7M31.5%
Year 5$68.4M+$13.3M$81.7M32.3%
$590.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$899.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$309.0M
Value Created
$81.7M
Exit EBITDA
$94.0M
Organic Growth
$133.3M
RCM Value Creation
$81.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.5M$3.8M$5.0M$6.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.5M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$81K$122K$162K$195K
Total$6.7M$10.0M$13.3M$16.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 149 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin23.3%-8.3%4.0%13.7%
P89
Net-to-Gross9.9%13.6%18.9%28.5%
P7
Occupancy71.8%49.4%64.5%73.9%
P68
Rev/Bed$1.3M$605K$1.2M$1.5M
P59
Exp/Bed$997K$610K$1.0M$1.4M
P44

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML