Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HERMANN MEMORIAL CITY MEDIC 2026-04-26 08:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HERMANN MEMORIAL CITY MEDIC
CCN 450610 | TX | 444 beds | Current EBITDA $14.2M → Pro Forma $49.0M (+$34.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$660.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$14.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$34.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$49.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$25.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

91%
Realization (A)
$34.7M
Modeled Uplift
$31.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 91% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $31.5M (vs $34.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$423K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$34.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.2M$13.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.7M$363K$13.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.0M$6.0M$8.0M$25.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$423K$423K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.3M$6.6M$9.9M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.3M$6.5M$9.8M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$211K$423K$423K$423K$423K$423K$423K
Cumulative$0$9.5M$18.9M$28.2M$34.7M$34.7M$34.7M$34.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $34.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x87% / 23.1x92% / 26.0x96% / 29.0x98% / 30.4x100% / 31.9x
9.0x82% / 20.2x87% / 22.8x91% / 25.4x93% / 26.7x95% / 28.0x
10.0x78% / 17.8x82% / 20.2x86% / 22.5x88% / 23.7x90% / 24.9x
11.0x74% / 15.9x78% / 18.1x82% / 20.2x84% / 21.2x86% / 22.3x
12.0x70% / 14.3x75% / 16.3x79% / 18.2x81% / 19.2x82% / 20.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.0x
Headroom (turns)
62%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 62% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.5x, adding 6.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$14.2M$14.2M2.2%
Year 1$14.6M+$23.2M$37.8M5.7%
Year 2$15.1M+$34.7M$49.8M7.5%
Year 3$15.5M+$34.7M$50.3M7.6%
Year 4$16.0M+$34.7M$50.7M7.7%
Year 5$16.5M+$34.7M$51.2M7.8%
$142.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$563.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$421.4M
Value Created
$51.2M
Exit EBITDA
$22.6M
Organic Growth
$347.5M
RCM Value Creation
$51.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.6M$9.9M$13.2M$15.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.5M$9.8M$13.1M$15.7M
A/R Days Reduction$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$9.6M
Clean Claim Rate$211K$317K$423K$507K
Total$17.4M$26.1M$34.7M$41.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 89 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.2%-10.5%4.5%14.7%
P43
Net-to-Gross24.0%12.4%18.1%25.2%
P66
Occupancy224.4%64.2%69.6%79.0%
P99
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
P63
Exp/Bed$1.5M$936K$1.3M$1.8M
P55

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML