Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HENDRICK MEDICAL CENTER BROWNWOOD 2026-04-27 03:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HENDRICK MEDICAL CENTER BROWNWOOD
CCN 450587 | TX | 57 beds | Current EBITDA $17.9M → Pro Forma $23.9M (+$6.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 450587

HENDRICK MEDICAL CENTER BROWNWOOD
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$114.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$17.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$23.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$6.0M
Modeled Uplift
$4.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.2M (vs $6.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$73K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.3M$2.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.2M$63K$2.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$351K$1.0M$1.4M$4.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$73K$73K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$573K$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$567K$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$464K$929K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$37K$73K$73K$73K$73K$73K$73K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.9M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.3x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.9x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$17.9M$17.9M15.6%
Year 1$18.4M+$4.0M$22.4M19.6%
Year 2$19.0M+$6.0M$25.0M21.8%
Year 3$19.5M+$6.0M$25.6M22.3%
Year 4$20.1M+$6.0M$26.2M22.8%
Year 5$20.7M+$6.0M$26.8M23.4%
$178.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$294.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$115.5M
Value Created
$26.8M
Exit EBITDA
$28.5M
Organic Growth
$60.2M
RCM Value Creation
$26.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M
A/R Days Reduction$697K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$37K$55K$73K$88K
Total$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 226 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.6%-14.0%0.2%11.7%
P81
Net-to-Gross16.6%19.4%30.8%50.9%
P18
Occupancy53.5%33.8%56.6%74.0%
P45
Rev/Bed$2.0M$326K$544K$1.0M
P92
Exp/Bed$1.7M$339K$492K$1.1M
P89

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML