Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT 2026-04-27 04:12 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
CCN 450586 | TX | 27 beds | Current EBITDA $-8.2M → Pro Forma $-7.7M (+$486K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 450586

BAYLOR COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$9.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-8.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$486K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-7.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+534bps
Margin Improvement
$350K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$486K
Modeled Uplift
$288K
Risk-Adjusted
-$198K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$184K
+202bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$182K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$111K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+11bp
Total EBITDA Impact$486K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$175K$8K$184K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$182K$182K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$28K$83K$111K$350K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$46K$92K$138K$184K$184K$184K$184K
Cost to Collect$0$46K$91K$137K$182K$182K$182K$182K
A/R Days Reduction$0$37K$74K$111K$111K$111K$111K$111K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$133K$266K$395K$486K$486K$486K$486K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $486K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-8.2M$-8.2M-90.2%
Year 1$-8.5M+$324K$-8.1M-89.4%
Year 2$-8.7M+$486K$-8.2M-90.4%
Year 3$-9.0M+$486K$-8.5M-93.3%
Year 4$-9.3M+$486K$-8.8M-96.2%
Year 5$-9.5M+$486K$-9.0M-99.3%
$-82.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-99.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$-17.3M
Value Created
$-9.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-13.1M
Organic Growth
$4.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-9.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$92K$138K$184K$220K
Cost to Collect$91K$137K$182K$219K
A/R Days Reduction$55K$83K$111K$133K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$243K$365K$486K$584K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 263 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-37.0%-7.8%9.8%
P0
Net-to-Gross42.4%24.7%35.7%51.6%
P62
Occupancy18.0%13.9%30.9%57.1%
P32
Rev/Bed$338K$423K$645K$1.3M
P17
Exp/Bed$642K$453K$834K$1.4M
P39

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML