Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HEMPHILL COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HEMPHILL COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 450578 | TX | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $-6.5M → Pro Forma $-5.9M (+$627K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$11.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-6.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$627K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-5.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$454K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$627K
Modeled Uplift
$380K
Risk-Adjusted
-$247K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$237K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$236K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$144K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$627K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$237K$237K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$228K$8K$236K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$36K$108K$144K$454K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$59K$118K$178K$237K$237K$237K$237K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$59K$118K$177K$236K$236K$236K$236K
A/R Days Reduction$0$48K$96K$144K$144K$144K$144K$144K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$171K$342K$509K$627K$627K$627K$627K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $627K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-6.5M$-6.5M-54.9%
Year 1$-6.7M+$418K$-6.3M-53.0%
Year 2$-6.9M+$627K$-6.3M-53.0%
Year 3$-7.1M+$627K$-6.5M-54.7%
Year 4$-7.3M+$627K$-6.7M-56.5%
Year 5$-7.5M+$627K$-6.9M-58.4%
$-65.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-76.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$-11.0M
Value Created
$-6.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-10.4M
Organic Growth
$6.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-6.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$118K$178K$237K$284K
Denial Rate Reductio$118K$177K$236K$284K
A/R Days Reduction$72K$108K$144K$173K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$313K$470K$627K$752K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 164 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-46.0%-18.7%8.0%
P0
Net-to-Gross60.4%26.0%39.5%56.2%
P78
Occupancy18.3%12.2%22.2%44.0%
P39
Rev/Bed$790K$456K$764K$1.4M
P50
Exp/Bed$1.2M$595K$1.0M$1.7M
P59

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML