Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — STEPHENS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:56 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — STEPHENS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 450498 | TX | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.5M → Pro Forma $-4.0M (+$500K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$9.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$500K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+533bps
Margin Improvement
$360K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$500K
Modeled Uplift
$292K
Risk-Adjusted
-$208K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$189K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$188K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$114K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+10bp
Total EBITDA Impact$500K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$181K$8K$189K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$188K$188K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$29K$85K$114K$360K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$47K$94K$142K$189K$189K$189K$189K
Cost to Collect$0$47K$94K$141K$188K$188K$188K$188K
A/R Days Reduction$0$38K$76K$114K$114K$114K$114K$114K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$137K$274K$406K$500K$500K$500K$500K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $500K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.5M$-4.5M-48.3%
Year 1$-4.7M+$334K$-4.3M-46.2%
Year 2$-4.8M+$500K$-4.3M-45.9%
Year 3$-5.0M+$500K$-4.5M-47.4%
Year 4$-5.1M+$500K$-4.6M-49.0%
Year 5$-5.3M+$500K$-4.8M-50.7%
$-45.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-52.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$-7.0M
Value Created
$-4.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-7.2M
Organic Growth
$5.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$94K$142K$189K$227K
Cost to Collect$94K$141K$188K$225K
A/R Days Reduction$57K$86K$114K$137K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$250K$375K$500K$601K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 287 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-48.3%-23.7%-2.9%10.4%
P12
Net-to-Gross34.4%24.4%34.4%51.0%
P50
Occupancy8.8%19.3%44.2%69.4%
P9
Rev/Bed$235K$371K$584K$1.2M
P10
Exp/Bed$348K$402K$631K$1.3M
P20

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML