Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL ARTS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 16:46 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL ARTS HOSPITAL
CCN 450489 | TX | 21 beds | Current EBITDA $-7.7M → Pro Forma $-7.0M (+$658K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-7.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$658K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-7.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$478K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$658K
Modeled Uplift
$386K
Risk-Adjusted
-$272K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$249K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$248K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$151K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$658K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$249K$249K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$240K$8K$248K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$38K$113K$151K$478K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$62K$124K$187K$249K$249K$249K$249K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$62K$124K$186K$248K$248K$248K$248K
A/R Days Reduction$0$50K$101K$151K$151K$151K$151K$151K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$180K$359K$534K$658K$658K$658K$658K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $658K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-7.7M$-7.7M-61.7%
Year 1$-7.9M+$439K$-7.5M-60.1%
Year 2$-8.2M+$658K$-7.5M-60.2%
Year 3$-8.4M+$658K$-7.7M-62.2%
Year 4$-8.6M+$658K$-8.0M-64.2%
Year 5$-8.9M+$658K$-8.3M-66.3%
$-76.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-90.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$-13.9M
Value Created
$-8.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-12.2M
Organic Growth
$6.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-8.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$124K$187K$249K$299K
Denial Rate Reductio$124K$186K$248K$297K
A/R Days Reduction$76K$114K$151K$182K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$329K$493K$658K$790K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 229 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-40.1%-8.9%9.2%
P0
Net-to-Gross38.6%25.6%37.7%54.0%
P51
Occupancy13.1%12.5%26.8%53.0%
P27
Rev/Bed$593K$439K$654K$1.3M
P44
Exp/Bed$959K$469K$877K$1.4M
P55

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML