Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UT HEALTH EAST TEXAS HENDERSON HOSPI 2026-04-26 14:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UT HEALTH EAST TEXAS HENDERSON HOSPI
CCN 450475 | TX | 41 beds | Current EBITDA $4.2M → Pro Forma $6.6M (+$2.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$44.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.3M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$847K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$887K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$878K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$540K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$28K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$887K$887K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$854K$24K$878K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$136K$403K$540K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$28K$28K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$222K$443K$665K$887K$887K$887K$887K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$219K$439K$658K$878K$878K$878K$878K
A/R Days Reduction$0$180K$360K$540K$540K$540K$540K$540K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K
Cumulative$0$635K$1.3M$1.9M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.4x
9.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x
10.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
11.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
12.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.1x
Headroom (turns)
16%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 16% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.4x, adding 3.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.2M$4.2M9.5%
Year 1$4.3M+$1.6M$5.9M13.3%
Year 2$4.5M+$2.3M$6.8M15.4%
Year 3$4.6M+$2.3M$6.9M15.7%
Year 4$4.7M+$2.3M$7.1M16.0%
Year 5$4.9M+$2.3M$7.2M16.3%
$42.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$79.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$37.3M
Value Created
$7.2M
Exit EBITDA
$6.7M
Organic Growth
$23.3M
RCM Value Creation
$7.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$443K$665K$887K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$439K$658K$878K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$270K$405K$540K$647K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$21K$28K$34K
Total$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M$2.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 279 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.5%-22.8%-2.6%10.5%
P72
Net-to-Gross15.2%24.4%34.4%50.3%
P9
Occupancy32.0%20.0%44.7%70.5%
P38
Rev/Bed$1.1M$381K$584K$1.2M
P73
Exp/Bed$979K$402K$622K$1.3M
P65

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML