Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAN JACINTO METHODIST HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 10:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAN JACINTO METHODIST HOSPITAL
CCN 450424 | TX | 240 beds | Current EBITDA $8.7M → Pro Forma $28.9M (+$20.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$384.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$28.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$20.2M
Modeled Uplift
$14.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.2M (vs $20.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$246K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.7M$7.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.4M$212K$7.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.5M$4.7M$14.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$246K$246K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.8M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$123K$246K$246K$246K$246K$246K$246K
Cumulative$0$5.5M$11.0M$16.4M$20.2M$20.2M$20.2M$20.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x86% / 22.2x90% / 25.1x95% / 27.9x97% / 29.3x98% / 30.8x
9.0x81% / 19.4x85% / 21.9x90% / 24.4x91% / 25.7x93% / 27.0x
10.0x77% / 17.1x81% / 19.4x85% / 21.7x87% / 22.8x89% / 23.9x
11.0x73% / 15.3x77% / 17.4x81% / 19.4x83% / 20.4x85% / 21.5x
12.0x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.6x77% / 17.5x79% / 18.5x81% / 19.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.0x
Headroom (turns)
61%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 61% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.5x, adding 5.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.7M$8.7M2.3%
Year 1$9.0M+$13.5M$22.4M5.8%
Year 2$9.2M+$20.2M$29.5M7.7%
Year 3$9.5M+$20.2M$29.7M7.7%
Year 4$9.8M+$20.2M$30.0M7.8%
Year 5$10.1M+$20.2M$30.3M7.9%
$86.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$333.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$246.5M
Value Created
$30.3M
Exit EBITDA
$13.8M
Organic Growth
$202.3M
RCM Value Creation
$30.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.8M$5.8M$7.7M$9.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$9.1M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M
Clean Claim Rate$123K$185K$246K$295K
Total$10.1M$15.2M$20.2M$24.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 140 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.3%-7.1%5.1%14.6%
P43
Net-to-Gross14.8%13.5%18.9%27.1%
P31
Occupancy66.5%53.7%66.7%76.8%
P46
Rev/Bed$1.6M$669K$1.2M$1.5M
P80
Exp/Bed$1.6M$689K$1.1M$1.5M
P79

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML