Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DALLAS MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 14:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DALLAS MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 450379 | TX | 119 beds | Current EBITDA $-18.9M → Pro Forma $-17.1M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$34.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-18.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-17.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$744K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$682K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$675K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$415K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$682K$682K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$657K$19K$675K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$105K$310K$415K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$171K$341K$512K$682K$682K$682K$682K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$169K$338K$507K$675K$675K$675K$675K
A/R Days Reduction$0$138K$277K$415K$415K$415K$415K$415K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$489K$977K$1.5M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-18.9M$-18.9M-55.5%
Year 1$-19.5M+$1.2M$-18.3M-53.6%
Year 2$-20.1M+$1.8M$-18.3M-53.6%
Year 3$-20.7M+$1.8M$-18.9M-55.4%
Year 4$-21.3M+$1.8M$-19.5M-57.2%
Year 5$-21.9M+$1.8M$-20.1M-59.0%
$-189.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-221.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$-32.3M
Value Created
$-20.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-30.1M
Organic Growth
$17.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-20.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$341K$512K$682K$819K
Denial Rate Reductio$338K$507K$675K$810K
A/R Days Reduction$208K$311K$415K$498K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$897K$1.3M$1.8M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 182 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-8.5%2.2%11.6%
P0
Net-to-Gross14.3%16.2%25.0%36.8%
P21
Occupancy14.4%47.2%64.6%75.7%
P4
Rev/Bed$287K$314K$603K$1.3M
P23
Exp/Bed$446K$334K$616K$1.2M
P36

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML