Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRESS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 12:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRESS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 450369 | TX | 37 beds | Current EBITDA $1.9M → Pro Forma $3.9M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$37.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$798K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$756K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$748K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$460K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$756K$756K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$727K$21K$748K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$116K$344K$460K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$189K$378K$567K$756K$756K$756K$756K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$187K$374K$561K$748K$748K$748K$748K
A/R Days Reduction$0$153K$306K$460K$460K$460K$460K$460K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$541K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x66% / 12.8x71% / 14.6x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.2x79% / 18.1x
9.0x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x
10.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.4x67% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x
11.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x
12.0x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.3x
Headroom (turns)
36%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 36% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.2x, adding 4.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.9M$1.9M5.1%
Year 1$2.0M+$1.3M$3.3M8.7%
Year 2$2.0M+$2.0M$4.0M10.7%
Year 3$2.1M+$2.0M$4.1M10.8%
Year 4$2.2M+$2.0M$4.1M11.0%
Year 5$2.2M+$2.0M$4.2M11.2%
$19.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$46.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$27.1M
Value Created
$4.2M
Exit EBITDA
$3.1M
Organic Growth
$19.9M
RCM Value Creation
$4.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$378K$567K$756K$907K
Denial Rate Reductio$374K$561K$748K$898K
A/R Days Reduction$230K$345K$460K$552K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$29K
Total$994K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 279 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.1%-24.9%-3.3%10.4%
P65
Net-to-Gross45.8%24.2%34.4%49.9%
P69
Occupancy16.4%18.9%42.4%66.7%
P22
Rev/Bed$1.0M$386K$599K$1.2M
P70
Exp/Bed$969K$410K$675K$1.3M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML