Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TEXAS HEALTH HARRIS METHODIST STEPHE 2026-04-26 21:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TEXAS HEALTH HARRIS METHODIST STEPHE
CCN 450351 | TX | 47 beds | Current EBITDA $8.1M → Pro Forma $11.6M (+$3.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$66.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$3.5M
Modeled Uplift
$2.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.2M (vs $3.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$805K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$42K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$36K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$203K$602K$805K$2.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$42K$42K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$331K$662K$993K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$328K$655K$983K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$268K$537K$805K$805K$805K$805K$805K
Clean Claim Rate$0$21K$42K$42K$42K$42K$42K$42K
Cumulative$0$948K$1.9M$2.8M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.7x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x
9.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
10.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.1M$8.1M12.2%
Year 1$8.3M+$2.3M$10.7M16.1%
Year 2$8.6M+$3.5M$12.1M18.2%
Year 3$8.9M+$3.5M$12.3M18.6%
Year 4$9.1M+$3.5M$12.6M19.0%
Year 5$9.4M+$3.5M$12.9M19.5%
$81.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$141.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$60.6M
Value Created
$12.9M
Exit EBITDA
$12.9M
Organic Growth
$34.8M
RCM Value Creation
$12.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$662K$993K$1.3M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$655K$983K$1.3M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$403K$604K$805K$966K
Clean Claim Rate$21K$32K$42K$51K
Total$1.7M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 279 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.2%-21.1%-2.9%10.9%
P78
Net-to-Gross31.6%24.0%34.1%51.2%
P47
Occupancy29.8%22.8%49.3%71.9%
P32
Rev/Bed$1.4M$338K$562K$1.1M
P83
Exp/Bed$1.2M$377K$538K$1.2M
P75

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML