Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TEXOMA MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 12:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TEXOMA MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 450324 | TX | 377 beds | Current EBITDA $9.5M → Pro Forma $32.1M (+$22.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$428.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$9.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$22.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$32.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$22.5M
Modeled Uplift
$16.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.1M (vs $22.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$274K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$22.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.6M$8.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.2M$236K$8.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.9M$5.2M$16.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$274K$274K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.1M$4.3M$6.4M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.4M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$137K$274K$274K$274K$274K$274K$274K
Cumulative$0$6.1M$12.3M$18.3M$22.5M$22.5M$22.5M$22.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $22.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x86% / 22.5x91% / 25.4x95% / 28.2x97% / 29.6x99% / 31.1x
9.0x81% / 19.6x86% / 22.2x90% / 24.7x92% / 26.0x94% / 27.2x
10.0x77% / 17.3x81% / 19.6x85% / 21.9x87% / 23.1x89% / 24.2x
11.0x73% / 15.5x77% / 17.6x81% / 19.6x83% / 20.7x85% / 21.7x
12.0x69% / 13.9x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.7x80% / 18.7x81% / 19.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.0x
Headroom (turns)
61%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 61% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.5x, adding 5.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$9.5M$9.5M2.2%
Year 1$9.8M+$15.0M$24.9M5.8%
Year 2$10.1M+$22.5M$32.7M7.6%
Year 3$10.4M+$22.5M$33.0M7.7%
Year 4$10.7M+$22.5M$33.3M7.8%
Year 5$11.1M+$22.5M$33.6M7.8%
$95.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$369.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$274.1M
Value Created
$33.6M
Exit EBITDA
$15.2M
Organic Growth
$225.3M
RCM Value Creation
$33.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.3M$6.4M$8.6M$10.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.2M$6.4M$8.5M$10.2M
A/R Days Reduction$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.3M
Clean Claim Rate$137K$206K$274K$329K
Total$11.3M$16.9M$22.5M$27.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 105 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.2%-8.3%4.1%14.6%
P45
Net-to-Gross13.4%13.4%18.3%25.2%
P25
Occupancy80.4%61.3%69.4%78.1%
P81
Rev/Bed$1.1M$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
P30
Exp/Bed$1.1M$895K$1.2M$1.6M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML