Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HENDRICK MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HENDRICK MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 450229 | TX | 599 beds | Current EBITDA $33.8M → Pro Forma $71.2M (+$37.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$709.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$33.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$37.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$71.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$27.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$37.3M
Modeled Uplift
$23.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$14.1M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $23.3M (vs $37.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$14.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$14.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$454K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$37.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$14.2M$14.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.7M$390K$14.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.2M$6.5M$8.6M$27.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$454K$454K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.5M$7.1M$10.6M$14.2M$14.2M$14.2M$14.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.5M$7.0M$10.5M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.9M$5.8M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$227K$454K$454K$454K$454K$454K$454K
Cumulative$0$10.2M$20.3M$30.3M$37.3M$37.3M$37.3M$37.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $37.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.1x76% / 17.0x78% / 17.9x80% / 18.8x
9.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.1x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.4x
10.0x58% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.7x70% / 14.4x
11.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x
12.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.5x
Headroom (turns)
38%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 38% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.0x, adding 4.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$33.8M$33.8M4.8%
Year 1$34.8M+$24.9M$59.7M8.4%
Year 2$35.9M+$37.3M$73.2M10.3%
Year 3$37.0M+$37.3M$74.3M10.5%
Year 4$38.1M+$37.3M$75.4M10.6%
Year 5$39.2M+$37.3M$76.5M10.8%
$338.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$842.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$503.9M
Value Created
$76.5M
Exit EBITDA
$53.9M
Organic Growth
$373.4M
RCM Value Creation
$76.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.1M$10.6M$14.2M$17.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.0M$10.5M$14.1M$16.9M
A/R Days Reduction$4.3M$6.5M$8.6M$10.4M
Clean Claim Rate$227K$341K$454K$545K
Total$18.7M$28.0M$37.3M$44.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 57 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.8%-17.0%2.8%12.6%
P54
Net-to-Gross12.4%13.4%18.3%25.8%
P21
Occupancy48.0%65.6%73.7%80.4%
P4
Rev/Bed$1.2M$1.2M$1.4M$1.8M
P25
Exp/Bed$1.1M$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M
P37

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML