Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CONROE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 12:28 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CONROE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 450222 | TX | 275 beds | Current EBITDA $58.9M → Pro Forma $73.3M (+$14.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$275.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$58.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$73.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$14.5M
Modeled Uplift
$9.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.9M (vs $14.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$176K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.5M$5.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.3M$151K$5.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$844K$2.5M$3.3M$10.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$176K$176K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.1M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$88K$176K$176K$176K$176K$176K$176K
Cumulative$0$3.9M$7.9M$11.7M$14.5M$14.5M$14.5M$14.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.4x
9.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x50% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$58.9M$58.9M21.4%
Year 1$60.6M+$9.6M$70.3M25.5%
Year 2$62.4M+$14.5M$76.9M28.0%
Year 3$64.3M+$14.5M$78.8M28.6%
Year 4$66.2M+$14.5M$80.7M29.3%
Year 5$68.2M+$14.5M$82.7M30.1%
$588.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$909.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$321.2M
Value Created
$82.7M
Exit EBITDA
$93.7M
Organic Growth
$144.7M
RCM Value Creation
$82.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.8M$4.1M$5.5M$6.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.7M$2.5M$3.3M$4.0M
Clean Claim Rate$88K$132K$176K$211K
Total$7.2M$10.9M$14.5M$17.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 133 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.4%-7.9%4.9%14.7%
P84
Net-to-Gross9.6%12.6%18.0%25.2%
P7
Occupancy63.4%54.5%66.6%75.6%
P39
Rev/Bed$1.0M$720K$1.2M$1.5M
P32
Exp/Bed$786K$713K$1.1M$1.5M
P30

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML