Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UT HEALTH EAST TEXAS CARTHAGE HOSPIT 2026-04-26 12:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UT HEALTH EAST TEXAS CARTHAGE HOSPIT
CCN 450210 | TX | 42 beds | Current EBITDA $-660K → Pro Forma $431K (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$20.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-660K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$431K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$795K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$635K
Risk-Adjusted
-$455K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$415K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$410K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$252K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$415K$415K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$399K$11K$410K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$64K$189K$252K$795K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$104K$207K$311K$415K$415K$415K$415K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$103K$205K$308K$410K$410K$410K$410K
A/R Days Reduction$0$84K$168K$252K$252K$252K$252K$252K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$297K$594K$884K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-13.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
19.5x
Headroom (turns)
299%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 299% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -13.0x, adding 112.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-660K$-660K-3.2%
Year 1$-679K+$727K$48K0.2%
Year 2$-700K+$1.1M$391K1.9%
Year 3$-721K+$1.1M$370K1.8%
Year 4$-742K+$1.1M$348K1.7%
Year 5$-765K+$1.1M$326K1.6%
$-6.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$3.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.2M
Value Created
$326K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.1M
Organic Growth
$10.9M
RCM Value Creation
$326K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$207K$311K$415K$497K
Denial Rate Reductio$205K$308K$410K$492K
A/R Days Reduction$126K$189K$252K$303K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$13K$16K
Total$545K$818K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 284 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.2%-22.5%-2.5%10.6%
P48
Net-to-Gross15.6%24.2%34.4%50.6%
P10
Occupancy7.9%20.0%45.1%70.4%
P7
Rev/Bed$493K$382K$577K$1.2M
P40
Exp/Bed$509K$398K$600K$1.3M
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML