Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTHWEST TEXAS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTHWEST TEXAS HOSPITAL
CCN 450209 | TX | 341 beds | Current EBITDA $43.8M → Pro Forma $64.0M (+$20.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$382.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$43.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$64.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$20.1M
Modeled Uplift
$13.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.6M (vs $20.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$245K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.7M$7.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.4M$210K$7.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.5M$4.7M$14.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$245K$245K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$122K$245K$245K$245K$245K$245K$245K
Cumulative$0$5.5M$11.0M$16.3M$20.1M$20.1M$20.1M$20.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.5x
9.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
10.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x
11.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$43.8M$43.8M11.5%
Year 1$45.2M+$13.4M$58.6M15.3%
Year 2$46.5M+$20.1M$66.6M17.4%
Year 3$47.9M+$20.1M$68.0M17.8%
Year 4$49.3M+$20.1M$69.5M18.2%
Year 5$50.8M+$20.1M$71.0M18.5%
$438.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$780.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$342.1M
Value Created
$71.0M
Exit EBITDA
$69.8M
Organic Growth
$201.3M
RCM Value Creation
$71.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.8M$5.7M$7.7M$9.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$9.1M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M
Clean Claim Rate$122K$184K$245K$294K
Total$10.1M$15.1M$20.1M$24.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 113 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.5%-7.9%4.8%14.7%
P65
Net-to-Gross13.8%12.7%18.1%25.0%
P27
Occupancy61.6%57.7%68.4%77.6%
P29
Rev/Bed$1.1M$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
P29
Exp/Bed$994K$895K$1.2M$1.6M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML