Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CITY WEATHERFORD 2026-04-26 18:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CITY WEATHERFORD
CCN 450203 | TX | 82 beds | Current EBITDA $28.6M → Pro Forma $35.7M (+$7.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$133.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$28.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$35.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$7.0M
Modeled Uplift
$5.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.2M (vs $7.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$85K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.7M$2.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.6M$73K$2.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$410K$1.2M$1.6M$5.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$85K$85K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$668K$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$661K$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$542K$1.1M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$43K$85K$85K$85K$85K$85K$85K
Cumulative$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.4x
9.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$28.6M$28.6M21.4%
Year 1$29.5M+$4.7M$34.2M25.6%
Year 2$30.4M+$7.0M$37.4M28.0%
Year 3$31.3M+$7.0M$38.3M28.7%
Year 4$32.2M+$7.0M$39.3M29.4%
Year 5$33.2M+$7.0M$40.2M30.1%
$286.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$442.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$156.1M
Value Created
$40.2M
Exit EBITDA
$45.6M
Organic Growth
$70.3M
RCM Value Creation
$40.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.2M
A/R Days Reduction$813K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$43K$64K$85K$103K
Total$3.5M$5.3M$7.0M$8.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 208 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.4%-11.2%2.0%11.7%
P90
Net-to-Gross12.9%16.8%28.0%43.2%
P9
Occupancy81.1%42.7%57.9%74.2%
P83
Rev/Bed$1.6M$286K$554K$1.1M
P89
Exp/Bed$1.3M$302K$492K$1.1M
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML