Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHI ST LUKES HEALTH BAYLOR MED CTR 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHI ST LUKES HEALTH BAYLOR MED CTR
CCN 450193 | TX | 628 beds | Current EBITDA $-104.7M → Pro Forma $-46.7M (+$58.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.10B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-104.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$58.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-46.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$42.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$58.0M
Modeled Uplift
$38.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$19.3M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $38.7M (vs $58.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$22.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$21.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$13.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$706K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$58.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$22.0M$22.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$21.2M$606K$21.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.4M$10.0M$13.4M$42.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$706K$706K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.5M$11.0M$16.5M$22.0M$22.0M$22.0M$22.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.5M$10.9M$16.4M$21.8M$21.8M$21.8M$21.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.5M$8.9M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$353K$706K$706K$706K$706K$706K$706K
Cumulative$0$15.8M$31.6M$47.0M$58.0M$58.0M$58.0M$58.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $58.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-104.7M$-104.7M-9.5%
Year 1$-107.9M+$38.7M$-69.2M-6.3%
Year 2$-111.1M+$58.0M$-53.1M-4.8%
Year 3$-114.4M+$58.0M$-56.4M-5.1%
Year 4$-117.9M+$58.0M$-59.9M-5.4%
Year 5$-121.4M+$58.0M$-63.4M-5.7%
$-1.05B
Entry EV (10x)
$-697.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$349.8M
Value Created
$-63.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-166.8M
Organic Growth
$580.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-63.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$11.0M$16.5M$22.0M$26.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$10.9M$16.4M$21.8M$26.2M
A/R Days Reduction$6.7M$10.1M$13.4M$16.1M
Clean Claim Rate$353K$529K$706K$847K
Total$29.0M$43.5M$58.0M$69.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.5%-13.7%2.8%12.6%
P27
Net-to-Gross20.3%13.1%18.0%25.2%
P56
Occupancy68.3%65.7%73.7%80.3%
P35
Rev/Bed$1.8M$1.2M$1.4M$1.8M
P73
Exp/Bed$1.9M$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M
P73

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML