Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SCOTT & WHITE HOSPITAL BRENHAM 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SCOTT & WHITE HOSPITAL BRENHAM
CCN 450187 | TX | 55 beds | Current EBITDA $123K → Pro Forma $773K (+$650K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$123K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$650K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$773K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$472K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$650K
Modeled Uplift
$395K
Risk-Adjusted
-$255K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$246K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$245K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$150K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$650K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$246K$246K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$237K$8K$245K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$38K$112K$150K$472K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$61K$123K$184K$246K$246K$246K$246K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$61K$122K$184K$245K$245K$245K$245K
A/R Days Reduction$0$50K$100K$150K$150K$150K$150K$150K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$177K$355K$527K$650K$650K$650K$650K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $650K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x113% / 44.0x118% / 49.3x123% / 54.5x125% / 57.2x127% / 59.8x
9.0x108% / 38.8x113% / 43.5x117% / 48.1x119% / 50.5x121% / 52.8x
10.0x103% / 34.6x108% / 38.8x112% / 43.0x114% / 45.1x116% / 47.2x
11.0x99% / 31.1x104% / 35.0x108% / 38.8x110% / 40.7x112% / 42.6x
12.0x95% / 28.3x100% / 31.8x104% / 35.3x106% / 37.0x108% / 38.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.2x
Headroom (turns)
79%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 79% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.3x, adding 7.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$123K$123K1.0%
Year 1$126K+$433K$560K4.6%
Year 2$130K+$650K$780K6.3%
Year 3$134K+$650K$784K6.4%
Year 4$138K+$650K$788K6.4%
Year 5$142K+$650K$792K6.4%
$1.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$8.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.5M
Value Created
$792K
Exit EBITDA
$195K
Organic Growth
$6.5M
RCM Value Creation
$792K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$123K$184K$246K$295K
Denial Rate Reductio$122K$184K$245K$294K
A/R Days Reduction$75K$112K$150K$180K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$325K$488K$650K$780K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 230 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.0%-14.0%0.2%11.7%
P51
Net-to-Gross22.6%19.7%31.0%50.9%
P28
Occupancy24.0%32.2%56.1%74.0%
P20
Rev/Bed$224K$326K$544K$1.0M
P13
Exp/Bed$221K$339K$495K$1.1M
P10

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML