Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TEXAS HEALTH CLEBURNE 2026-04-26 15:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TEXAS HEALTH CLEBURNE
CCN 450148 | TX | 75 beds | Current EBITDA $74K → Pro Forma $4.5M (+$4.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$84.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$74K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$4.5M
Modeled Uplift
$3.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.0M (vs $4.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$54K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.6M$47K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$261K$773K$1.0M$3.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$54K$54K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$425K$849K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$420K$841K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$345K$689K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$27K$54K$54K$54K$54K$54K$54K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x239% / 444.7x246% / 494.4x252% / 544.2x256% / 569.1x259% / 594.0x
9.0x231% / 394.9x238% / 439.1x244% / 483.4x247% / 505.5x250% / 527.6x
10.0x224% / 355.1x231% / 394.9x237% / 434.7x240% / 454.6x243% / 474.5x
11.0x217% / 322.5x224% / 358.7x231% / 394.9x234% / 413.0x236% / 431.1x
12.0x212% / 295.4x219% / 328.5x225% / 361.7x228% / 378.3x231% / 394.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.4x
Headroom (turns)
98%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 98% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.1x, adding 8.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$74K$74K0.1%
Year 1$77K+$3.0M$3.1M3.6%
Year 2$79K+$4.5M$4.5M5.4%
Year 3$81K+$4.5M$4.5M5.4%
Year 4$84K+$4.5M$4.6M5.4%
Year 5$86K+$4.5M$4.6M5.4%
$744K
Entry EV (10x)
$50.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$49.4M
Value Created
$4.6M
Exit EBITDA
$118K
Organic Growth
$44.7M
RCM Value Creation
$4.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$849K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$841K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$517K$775K$1.0M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$27K$41K$54K$65K
Total$2.2M$3.4M$4.5M$5.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 217 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.1%-11.8%1.5%11.7%
P47
Net-to-Gross25.3%17.5%30.3%46.4%
P39
Occupancy50.7%38.9%57.4%75.2%
P38
Rev/Bed$1.1M$293K$548K$1.1M
P77
Exp/Bed$1.1M$308K$494K$1.1M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML