Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DETAR HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS 2026-04-26 14:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DETAR HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS
CCN 450147 | TX | 178 beds | Current EBITDA $28.1M → Pro Forma $39.5M (+$11.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$216.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$28.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$39.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$11.4M
Modeled Uplift
$7.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.5M (vs $11.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$139K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.3M$4.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.2M$119K$4.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$665K$2.0M$2.6M$8.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$139K$139K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$879K$1.8M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$69K$139K$139K$139K$139K$139K$139K
Cumulative$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.2M$11.4M$11.4M$11.4M$11.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x
9.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x59% / 10.3x
10.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x
11.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
12.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$28.1M$28.1M13.0%
Year 1$28.9M+$7.6M$36.5M16.9%
Year 2$29.8M+$11.4M$41.2M19.0%
Year 3$30.7M+$11.4M$42.1M19.4%
Year 4$31.6M+$11.4M$43.0M19.8%
Year 5$32.6M+$11.4M$44.0M20.3%
$281.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$483.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$202.8M
Value Created
$44.0M
Exit EBITDA
$44.8M
Organic Growth
$114.1M
RCM Value Creation
$44.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.2M$3.3M$4.3M$5.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$5.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$69K$104K$139K$166K
Total$5.7M$8.6M$11.4M$13.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 159 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.0%-9.7%3.3%13.8%
P72
Net-to-Gross11.0%14.0%19.7%30.3%
P13
Occupancy46.1%49.3%64.2%74.4%
P20
Rev/Bed$1.2M$414K$1.1M$1.5M
P60
Exp/Bed$1.1M$465K$997K$1.4M
P55

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML