Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR S&W ALL SAINTS MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR S&W ALL SAINTS MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 450137 | TX | 438 beds | Current EBITDA $23.4M → Pro Forma $50.9M (+$27.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$521.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$23.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$27.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$50.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$27.4M
Modeled Uplift
$18.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $18.6M (vs $27.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$334K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$27.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.4M$10.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.0M$287K$10.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.7M$6.3M$20.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$334K$334K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.8M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.7M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$167K$334K$334K$334K$334K$334K$334K
Cumulative$0$7.5M$14.9M$22.2M$27.4M$27.4M$27.4M$27.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $27.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.7x77% / 17.6x79% / 18.5x81% / 19.5x
9.0x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.6x72% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x76% / 16.9x
10.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.2x72% / 14.9x
11.0x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x
12.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.4x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.6x
Headroom (turns)
40%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 40% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.9x, adding 4.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$23.4M$23.4M4.5%
Year 1$24.1M+$18.3M$42.4M8.1%
Year 2$24.9M+$27.4M$52.3M10.0%
Year 3$25.6M+$27.4M$53.0M10.2%
Year 4$26.4M+$27.4M$53.8M10.3%
Year 5$27.2M+$27.4M$54.6M10.5%
$234.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$600.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$366.2M
Value Created
$54.6M
Exit EBITDA
$37.3M
Organic Growth
$274.2M
RCM Value Creation
$54.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.2M$7.8M$10.4M$12.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.2M$7.7M$10.3M$12.4M
A/R Days Reduction$3.2M$4.8M$6.3M$7.6M
Clean Claim Rate$167K$250K$334K$400K
Total$13.7M$20.6M$27.4M$32.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.5%-10.2%4.5%14.7%
P49
Net-to-Gross30.8%12.5%18.1%25.2%
P81
Occupancy70.9%64.3%69.5%79.0%
P53
Rev/Bed$1.2M$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
P32
Exp/Bed$1.1M$944K$1.3M$1.7M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML