Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MIDLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MIDLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 450133 | TX | 226 beds | Current EBITDA $-49.9M → Pro Forma $-34.0M (+$15.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$302.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-49.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-34.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$15.9M
Modeled Uplift
$11.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.2M (vs $15.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$193K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.0M$6.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.8M$166K$6.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$927K$2.8M$3.7M$11.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$193K$193K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$97K$193K$193K$193K$193K$193K$193K
Cumulative$0$4.3M$8.7M$12.9M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-49.9M$-49.9M-16.5%
Year 1$-51.4M+$10.6M$-40.8M-13.5%
Year 2$-52.9M+$15.9M$-37.0M-12.2%
Year 3$-54.5M+$15.9M$-38.6M-12.8%
Year 4$-56.1M+$15.9M$-40.2M-13.3%
Year 5$-57.8M+$15.9M$-41.9M-13.9%
$-498.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-460.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$37.7M
Value Created
$-41.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-79.4M
Organic Growth
$159.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-41.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.8M$3.7M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$97K$145K$193K$232K
Total$8.0M$11.9M$15.9M$19.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 148 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-16.5%-8.0%4.9%13.7%
P16
Net-to-Gross23.6%13.7%19.0%28.1%
P62
Occupancy70.2%51.8%66.5%75.7%
P60
Rev/Bed$1.3M$632K$1.2M$1.5M
P61
Exp/Bed$1.6M$671K$1.1M$1.5M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML