Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KNAPP MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KNAPP MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 450128 | TX | 162 beds | Current EBITDA $-913K → Pro Forma $4.2M (+$5.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$97.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-913K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$5.2M
Modeled Uplift
$3.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.3M (vs $5.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$63K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.0M$2.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.9M$54K$1.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$301K$891K$1.2M$3.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$63K$63K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$490K$979K$1.5M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$485K$970K$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$397K$794K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$31K$63K$63K$63K$63K$63K$63K
Cumulative$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
8.3x
Headroom (turns)
128%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 128% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1.8x, adding 100.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-913K$-913K-0.9%
Year 1$-940K+$3.4M$2.5M2.5%
Year 2$-969K+$5.2M$4.2M4.3%
Year 3$-998K+$5.2M$4.2M4.2%
Year 4$-1.0M+$5.2M$4.1M4.2%
Year 5$-1.1M+$5.2M$4.1M4.2%
$-9.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$45.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$54.2M
Value Created
$4.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-1.5M
Organic Growth
$51.5M
RCM Value Creation
$4.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$979K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$970K$1.5M$1.9M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$596K$894K$1.2M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$31K$47K$63K$75K
Total$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 160 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.9%-9.0%2.6%14.6%
P39
Net-to-Gross16.0%14.0%21.1%30.8%
P31
Occupancy44.2%48.3%63.9%73.9%
P20
Rev/Bed$605K$387K$1.0M$1.5M
P34
Exp/Bed$610K$437K$965K$1.3M
P34

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML