Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DELL SETON MEDICAL CENTER AT THE UNI 2026-04-26 12:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DELL SETON MEDICAL CENTER AT THE UNI
CCN 450124 | TX | 225 beds | Current EBITDA $-18.3M → Pro Forma $4.7M (+$23.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$438.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-18.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$23.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

77%
Realization (B)
$23.1M
Modeled Uplift
$17.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.8M (vs $23.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$281K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$23.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.8M$8.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.4M$241K$8.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$4.0M$5.3M$16.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$281K$281K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.3M$6.5M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$140K$281K$281K$281K$281K$281K$281K
Cumulative$0$6.3M$12.6M$18.7M$23.1M$23.1M$23.1M$23.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $23.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-32.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
39.3x
Headroom (turns)
605%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 605% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -32.8x, adding 131.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-18.3M$-18.3M-4.2%
Year 1$-18.9M+$15.4M$-3.5M-0.8%
Year 2$-19.5M+$23.1M$3.6M0.8%
Year 3$-20.0M+$23.1M$3.0M0.7%
Year 4$-20.6M+$23.1M$2.4M0.6%
Year 5$-21.3M+$23.1M$1.8M0.4%
$-183.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$19.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$203.3M
Value Created
$1.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-29.2M
Organic Growth
$230.7M
RCM Value Creation
$1.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$10.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.3M$6.5M$8.7M$10.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.7M$4.0M$5.3M$6.4M
Clean Claim Rate$140K$211K$281K$337K
Total$11.5M$17.3M$23.1M$27.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 148 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.2%-8.0%4.9%13.7%
P32
Net-to-Gross17.8%13.7%19.0%28.1%
P43
Occupancy100.1%51.8%66.5%75.7%
P98
Rev/Bed$1.9M$632K$1.2M$1.5M
P91
Exp/Bed$2.0M$671K$1.1M$1.5M
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML