Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BRAZOSPORT REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BRAZOSPORT REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM
CCN 450072 | TX | 80 beds | Current EBITDA $1.3M → Pro Forma $6.2M (+$4.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$93.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$4.9M
Modeled Uplift
$3.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.3M (vs $4.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$60K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.9M$1.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.8M$51K$1.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$287K$850K$1.1M$3.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$60K$60K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$467K$934K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$463K$925K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$379K$758K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$30K$60K$60K$60K$60K$60K$60K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x101% / 32.5x105% / 36.5x110% / 40.5x112% / 42.5x114% / 44.5x
9.0x96% / 28.6x100% / 32.1x104% / 35.6x106% / 37.4x108% / 39.2x
10.0x91% / 25.4x96% / 28.6x100% / 31.7x102% / 33.3x104% / 34.9x
11.0x87% / 22.8x91% / 25.7x96% / 28.6x97% / 30.0x99% / 31.4x
12.0x83% / 20.6x88% / 23.3x92% / 25.9x94% / 27.2x96% / 28.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.7x
Headroom (turns)
73%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 73% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.8x, adding 6.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.3M$1.3M1.4%
Year 1$1.4M+$3.3M$4.6M5.0%
Year 2$1.4M+$4.9M$6.3M6.8%
Year 3$1.4M+$4.9M$6.4M6.8%
Year 4$1.5M+$4.9M$6.4M6.8%
Year 5$1.5M+$4.9M$6.4M6.9%
$13.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$70.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$57.7M
Value Created
$6.4M
Exit EBITDA
$2.1M
Organic Growth
$49.2M
RCM Value Creation
$6.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$934K$1.4M$1.9M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$925K$1.4M$1.9M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$568K$853K$1.1M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$30K$45K$60K$72K
Total$2.5M$3.7M$4.9M$5.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 224 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.4%-12.3%1.8%11.7%
P48
Net-to-Gross16.4%17.5%29.6%45.9%
P21
Occupancy44.4%39.8%57.3%75.0%
P30
Rev/Bed$1.2M$291K$554K$1.1M
P79
Exp/Bed$1.2M$309K$489K$1.1M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML