Bridge Realization Estimate
ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)
Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $91.2M (vs $138.9M modeled).
EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers
Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).
Lever Detail
Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.
| Lever | Current | Target | Revenue | Cost | EBITDA | WC | Ramp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | 4.5% DEFAULT | 2.5% BENCHMARK | $0 | $52.8M | $52.8M | $0 | 12mo |
| Denial Rate Reduction | 12.0% DEFAULT | 6.5% BENCHMARK | $50.8M | $1.5M | $52.3M | $0 | 12mo |
| A/R Days Reduction | 52.00 DEFAULT | 38.00 BENCHMARK | $8.1M | $24.0M | $32.1M | $101.3M | 9mo |
| Clean Claim Rate | 88.0% DEFAULT | 96.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $1.7M | $1.7M | $0 | 6mo |
| Net Collection Rate | 93.5% DEFAULT | 27.4% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
| CDI / Case Mix Index | 135.0% DEFAULT | 142.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
Implementation Timing Curve
Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.
| Lever | M0 | M3 | M6 | M9 | M12 | M18 | M24 | M36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $0 | $13.2M | $26.4M | $39.6M | $52.8M | $52.8M | $52.8M | $52.8M |
| Denial Rate Reduction | $0 | $13.1M | $26.1M | $39.2M | $52.3M | $52.3M | $52.3M | $52.3M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $0 | $10.7M | $21.4M | $32.1M | $32.1M | $32.1M | $32.1M | $32.1M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $0 | $845K | $1.7M | $1.7M | $1.7M | $1.7M | $1.7M | $1.7M |
| Cumulative | $0 | $37.8M | $75.7M | $112.6M | $138.9M | $138.9M | $138.9M | $138.9M |
Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)
5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $138.9M is added at exit.
| Entry \ Exit | 9.0x | 10.0x | 11.0x | 11.5x | 12.0x |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0x | 80% / 19.0x | 85% / 21.4x | 89% / 23.9x | 91% / 25.2x | 92% / 26.4x |
| 9.0x | 75% / 16.5x | 80% / 18.7x | 84% / 20.9x | 86% / 22.0x | 87% / 23.1x |
| 10.0x | 71% / 14.5x | 75% / 16.5x | 79% / 18.5x | 81% / 19.5x | 83% / 20.5x |
| 11.0x | 67% / 12.9x | 71% / 14.7x | 75% / 16.5x | 77% / 17.4x | 79% / 18.3x |
| 12.0x | 63% / 11.6x | 68% / 13.2x | 72% / 14.9x | 73% / 15.7x | 75% / 16.5x |
Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)
Pro forma EBITDA can decline 55% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.9x, adding 5.5 turns of cushion.
5-Year Value Creation Waterfall
EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).
| Base EBITDA | RCM Uplift | Total | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | $73.9M | — | $73.9M | 2.8% |
| Year 1 | $76.1M | +$92.6M | $168.7M | 6.4% |
| Year 2 | $78.4M | +$138.9M | $217.3M | 8.2% |
| Year 3 | $80.7M | +$138.9M | $219.6M | 8.3% |
| Year 4 | $83.1M | +$138.9M | $222.1M | 8.4% |
| Year 5 | $85.6M | +$138.9M | $224.6M | 8.5% |
Achievement Sensitivity
What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.
| Lever | 50% | 75% | 100% | 120% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $26.4M | $39.6M | $52.8M | $63.4M |
| Denial Rate Reductio | $26.1M | $39.2M | $52.3M | $62.7M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $16.1M | $24.1M | $32.1M | $38.6M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $845K | $1.3M | $1.7M | $2.0M |
| Total | $69.5M | $104.2M | $138.9M | $166.7M |
Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits
Key metrics vs 23 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.
| Metric | Hospital | P25 | P50 | P75 | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Op Margin | 2.8% | -20.2% | 0.4% | 10.0% | P52 |
| Net-to-Gross | 25.2% | 12.8% | 22.8% | 27.4% | P65 |
| Occupancy | 80.1% | 67.9% | 78.0% | 82.0% | P61 |
| Rev/Bed | $2.4M | $1.3M | $1.6M | $2.1M | P74 |
| Exp/Bed | $2.4M | $1.1M | $1.6M | $2.8M | P65 |
Bridge Methodology
Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.