Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION SETON MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION SETON MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 450056 | TX | 391 beds | Current EBITDA $88.6M → Pro Forma $125.6M (+$37.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$702.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$88.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$37.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$125.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$26.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$37.0M
Modeled Uplift
$26.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $26.9M (vs $37.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$14.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$450K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$37.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$14.1M$14.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.5M$386K$13.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.2M$6.4M$8.5M$26.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$450K$450K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.5M$7.0M$10.5M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.5M$7.0M$10.4M$13.9M$13.9M$13.9M$13.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.8M$5.7M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$225K$450K$450K$450K$450K$450K$450K
Cumulative$0$10.1M$20.1M$30.0M$37.0M$37.0M$37.0M$37.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $37.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x
9.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
10.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x
11.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
12.0x35% / 4.4x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$88.6M$88.6M12.6%
Year 1$91.3M+$24.6M$115.9M16.5%
Year 2$94.0M+$37.0M$131.0M18.6%
Year 3$96.8M+$37.0M$133.8M19.0%
Year 4$99.7M+$37.0M$136.7M19.5%
Year 5$102.7M+$37.0M$139.7M19.9%
$886.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.54B
Exit EV (11x)
$650.4M
Value Created
$139.7M
Exit EBITDA
$141.2M
Organic Growth
$369.6M
RCM Value Creation
$139.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.0M$10.5M$14.1M$16.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.0M$10.4M$13.9M$16.7M
A/R Days Reduction$4.3M$6.4M$8.5M$10.3M
Clean Claim Rate$225K$337K$450K$540K
Total$18.5M$27.7M$37.0M$44.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 101 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.6%-8.3%4.1%14.6%
P68
Net-to-Gross18.0%13.4%18.3%25.0%
P47
Occupancy85.0%61.2%69.0%78.3%
P88
Rev/Bed$1.8M$1.0M$1.3M$1.7M
P81
Exp/Bed$1.6M$895K$1.2M$1.7M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML