Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UT SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY HOSP 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UT SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY HOSP
CCN 450044 | TX | 737 beds | Current EBITDA $-104.8M → Pro Forma $15.1M (+$120.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$2.28B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-104.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$120.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$87.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$120.0M
Modeled Uplift
$83.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$36.7M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $83.2M (vs $120.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$45.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$45.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$27.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.5M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$120.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$45.6M$45.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$43.9M$1.3M$45.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$7.0M$20.8M$27.7M$87.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT26.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$11.4M$22.8M$34.2M$45.6M$45.6M$45.6M$45.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$11.3M$22.6M$33.9M$45.2M$45.2M$45.2M$45.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$9.2M$18.5M$27.7M$27.7M$27.7M$27.7M$27.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$730K$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Cumulative$0$32.7M$65.3M$97.3M$120.0M$120.0M$120.0M$120.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $120.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-58.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
65.1x
Headroom (turns)
1002%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1002% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -58.6x, adding 157.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-104.8M$-104.8M-4.6%
Year 1$-108.0M+$80.0M$-28.0M-1.2%
Year 2$-111.2M+$120.0M$8.7M0.4%
Year 3$-114.6M+$120.0M$5.4M0.2%
Year 4$-118.0M+$120.0M$2.0M0.1%
Year 5$-121.5M+$120.0M$-1.6M-0.1%
$-1.05B
Entry EV (10x)
$-17.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.03B
Value Created
$-1.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-167.0M
Organic Growth
$1.20B
RCM Value Creation
$-1.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$22.8M$34.2M$45.6M$54.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$22.6M$33.9M$45.2M$54.2M
A/R Days Reduction$13.9M$20.8M$27.7M$33.3M
Clean Claim Rate$730K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Total$60.0M$90.0M$120.0M$144.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 42 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.6%-10.2%2.5%12.6%
P36
Net-to-Gross34.8%13.6%21.2%26.5%
P86
Occupancy78.0%67.5%74.8%81.5%
P57
Rev/Bed$3.1M$1.3M$1.5M$1.8M
P90
Exp/Bed$3.2M$1.1M$1.5M$2.3M
P86

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML