Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHRISTUS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHRISTUS HOSPITAL
CCN 450034 | TX | 353 beds | Current EBITDA $25.1M → Pro Forma $46.9M (+$21.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$415.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$25.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$21.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$46.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$21.8M
Modeled Uplift
$14.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.4M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.4M (vs $21.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$266K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$21.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.3M$8.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.0M$228K$8.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.8M$5.0M$15.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$266K$266K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT24.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.1M$4.1M$6.2M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.1M$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$133K$266K$266K$266K$266K$266K$266K
Cumulative$0$5.9M$11.9M$17.7M$21.8M$21.8M$21.8M$21.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $21.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x63% / 11.6x68% / 13.2x72% / 14.9x73% / 15.7x75% / 16.5x
9.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x
10.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
11.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
12.0x46% / 6.6x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.0x
Headroom (turns)
30%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 30% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.5x, adding 3.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$25.1M$25.1M6.1%
Year 1$25.9M+$14.6M$40.4M9.7%
Year 2$26.6M+$21.8M$48.5M11.7%
Year 3$27.4M+$21.8M$49.3M11.9%
Year 4$28.3M+$21.8M$50.1M12.1%
Year 5$29.1M+$21.8M$50.9M12.3%
$251.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$560.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$309.3M
Value Created
$50.9M
Exit EBITDA
$40.0M
Organic Growth
$218.3M
RCM Value Creation
$50.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.1M$6.2M$8.3M$10.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$9.9M
A/R Days Reduction$2.5M$3.8M$5.0M$6.1M
Clean Claim Rate$133K$199K$266K$319K
Total$10.9M$16.4M$21.8M$26.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 111 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.1%-8.1%4.8%14.6%
P53
Net-to-Gross18.3%12.6%18.0%24.6%
P52
Occupancy55.5%57.5%68.5%77.7%
P19
Rev/Bed$1.2M$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
P33
Exp/Bed$1.1M$880K$1.2M$1.6M
P41

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML