Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — VALLEY BAPTIST MED CNTR BROWNSVILLE 2026-04-26 09:32 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — VALLEY BAPTIST MED CNTR BROWNSVILLE
CCN 450028 | TX | 240 beds | Current EBITDA $37.4M → Pro Forma $48.0M (+$10.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$202.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$37.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$48.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$10.6M
Modeled Uplift
$7.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.2M (vs $10.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$130K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.0M$4.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.9M$111K$4.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$621K$1.8M$2.5M$7.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$130K$130K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$821K$1.6M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$65K$130K$130K$130K$130K$130K$130K
Cumulative$0$2.9M$5.8M$8.6M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
9.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x
11.0x35% / 4.4x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
12.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$37.4M$37.4M18.5%
Year 1$38.5M+$7.1M$45.6M22.5%
Year 2$39.7M+$10.6M$50.3M24.9%
Year 3$40.9M+$10.6M$51.5M25.4%
Year 4$42.1M+$10.6M$52.7M26.1%
Year 5$43.4M+$10.6M$54.0M26.7%
$374.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$594.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$220.1M
Value Created
$54.0M
Exit EBITDA
$59.6M
Organic Growth
$106.5M
RCM Value Creation
$54.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.8M$2.5M$3.0M
Clean Claim Rate$65K$97K$130K$155K
Total$5.3M$8.0M$10.6M$12.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 140 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.5%-7.1%5.1%14.6%
P84
Net-to-Gross8.8%13.5%18.9%27.1%
P4
Occupancy57.7%53.7%66.7%76.8%
P33
Rev/Bed$843K$669K$1.2M$1.5M
P29
Exp/Bed$688K$689K$1.1M$1.5M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML