Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DALLAS CO. HOSP. DIST. 2026-04-26 02:17 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DALLAS CO. HOSP. DIST.
CCN 450015 | TX | 786 beds | Current EBITDA $78.8M → Pro Forma $130.7M (+$51.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$985.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$78.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$51.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$130.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$37.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$51.8M
Modeled Uplift
$35.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$16.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $35.7M (vs $51.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$19.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$19.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$12.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$631K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$51.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$19.7M$19.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$19.0M$542K$19.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.0M$9.0M$12.0M$37.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$631K$631K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT26.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.9M$9.9M$14.8M$19.7M$19.7M$19.7M$19.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.9M$9.8M$14.6M$19.5M$19.5M$19.5M$19.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.0M$8.0M$12.0M$12.0M$12.0M$12.0M$12.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$315K$631K$631K$631K$631K$631K$631K
Cumulative$0$14.1M$28.2M$42.0M$51.8M$51.8M$51.8M$51.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $51.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x
9.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
10.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.7x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
11.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
12.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
21%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 21% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$78.8M$78.8M8.0%
Year 1$81.2M+$34.6M$115.8M11.7%
Year 2$83.6M+$51.8M$135.5M13.7%
Year 3$86.1M+$51.8M$138.0M14.0%
Year 4$88.7M+$51.8M$140.6M14.3%
Year 5$91.4M+$51.8M$143.2M14.5%
$788.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.58B
Exit EV (11x)
$787.2M
Value Created
$143.2M
Exit EBITDA
$125.6M
Organic Growth
$518.4M
RCM Value Creation
$143.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$9.9M$14.8M$19.7M$23.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$9.8M$14.6M$19.5M$23.4M
A/R Days Reduction$6.0M$9.0M$12.0M$14.4M
Clean Claim Rate$315K$473K$631K$757K
Total$25.9M$38.9M$51.8M$62.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 38 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-15.4%3.5%13.0%
P0
Net-to-Gross11.8%12.7%21.2%26.5%
P18
Occupancy82.0%67.7%74.8%81.4%
P76
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.2M$1.5M$1.7M
P26
Exp/Bed$3.0M$1.0M$1.4M$2.3M
P84

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML