Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 05:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER
CCN 450011 | TX | 298 beds | Current EBITDA $-154.3M → Pro Forma $-133.4M (+$21.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$399.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-154.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$21.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-133.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$21.0M
Modeled Uplift
$14.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.5M (vs $21.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$255K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$21.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.0M$8.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.7M$219K$7.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.6M$4.9M$15.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$255K$255K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.0M$4.0M$5.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$128K$255K$255K$255K$255K$255K$255K
Cumulative$0$5.7M$11.4M$17.0M$21.0M$21.0M$21.0M$21.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $21.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-154.3M$-154.3M-38.7%
Year 1$-159.0M+$14.0M$-145.0M-36.3%
Year 2$-163.7M+$21.0M$-142.8M-35.8%
Year 3$-168.7M+$21.0M$-147.7M-37.0%
Year 4$-173.7M+$21.0M$-152.7M-38.3%
Year 5$-178.9M+$21.0M$-157.9M-39.6%
$-1.54B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.74B
Exit EV (11x)
$-193.9M
Value Created
$-157.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-245.8M
Organic Growth
$209.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-157.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$9.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.0M$5.9M$7.9M$9.5M
A/R Days Reduction$2.4M$3.6M$4.9M$5.8M
Clean Claim Rate$128K$192K$255K$306K
Total$10.5M$15.7M$21.0M$25.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 129 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-38.7%-7.8%5.4%15.5%
P9
Net-to-Gross15.5%12.6%18.1%25.2%
P36
Occupancy66.5%55.8%67.5%75.7%
P47
Rev/Bed$1.3M$861K$1.3M$1.5M
P57
Exp/Bed$1.9M$775K$1.1M$1.6M
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML