Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CREEKSIDE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 2026-04-26 17:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CREEKSIDE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
CCN 444027 | TN | 72 beds | Current EBITDA $1.3M → Pro Forma $2.2M (+$886K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$886K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$646K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$886K
Modeled Uplift
$642K
Risk-Adjusted
-$244K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$337K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$333K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$205K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$886K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$337K$337K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$324K$9K$333K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$52K$153K$205K$646K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$84K$168K$253K$337K$337K$337K$337K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$83K$167K$250K$333K$333K$333K$333K
A/R Days Reduction$0$68K$137K$205K$205K$205K$205K$205K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$241K$482K$718K$886K$886K$886K$886K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $886K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.3x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x
9.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x
10.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
11.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
12.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
23%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 23% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.3M$1.3M7.6%
Year 1$1.3M+$590K$1.9M11.4%
Year 2$1.4M+$886K$2.2M13.4%
Year 3$1.4M+$886K$2.3M13.6%
Year 4$1.4M+$886K$2.3M13.8%
Year 5$1.5M+$886K$2.4M14.1%
$12.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$26.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.3M
Value Created
$2.4M
Exit EBITDA
$2.0M
Organic Growth
$8.9M
RCM Value Creation
$2.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$168K$253K$337K$404K
Denial Rate Reductio$167K$250K$333K$400K
A/R Days Reduction$102K$154K$205K$246K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$443K$664K$886K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 62 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.6%-11.3%-0.2%12.1%
P67
Net-to-Gross27.8%17.6%22.7%42.7%
P58
Occupancy82.5%28.8%60.8%74.0%
P84
Rev/Bed$234K$391K$549K$1.1M
P12
Exp/Bed$216K$348K$550K$1.1M
P11

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML