Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTERS 2026-04-26 05:24 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTERS
CCN 444024 | TN | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $362K → Pro Forma $606K (+$244K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$4.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$362K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$244K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$606K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+555bps
Margin Improvement
$169K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$244K
Modeled Uplift
$179K
Risk-Adjusted
-$65K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$93K
+211bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$88K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$54K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+22bp
Total EBITDA Impact$244K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$85K$8K$93K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$88K$88K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$13K$40K$54K$169K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$23K$46K$70K$93K$93K$93K$93K
Cost to Collect$0$22K$44K$66K$88K$88K$88K$88K
A/R Days Reduction$0$18K$36K$54K$54K$54K$54K$54K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$68K$136K$199K$244K$244K$244K$244K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $244K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.6x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.6x
9.0x54% / 8.7x58% / 10.0x62% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.6x
10.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
11.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
12.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$362K$362K8.2%
Year 1$373K+$163K$536K12.2%
Year 2$385K+$244K$629K14.3%
Year 3$396K+$244K$640K14.6%
Year 4$408K+$244K$652K14.8%
Year 5$420K+$244K$664K15.1%
$3.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$7.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.7M
Value Created
$664K
Exit EBITDA
$577K
Organic Growth
$2.4M
RCM Value Creation
$664K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$46K$70K$93K$111K
Cost to Collect$44K$66K$88K$106K
A/R Days Reduction$27K$40K$54K$64K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$122K$183K$244K$293K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 36 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.2%-16.1%-0.9%7.4%
P74
Net-to-Gross75.5%22.5%32.3%43.4%
P86
Occupancy86.0%17.4%30.9%59.4%
P86
Rev/Bed$275K$401K$569K$1.1M
P14
Exp/Bed$252K$390K$651K$1.2M
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML