Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE CENTERS LLC 2026-04-27 01:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE CENTERS LLC
CCN 444019 | TN | 26 beds | Current EBITDA $-673K → Pro Forma $-422K (+$250K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 444019

BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE CENTERS LLC
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$4.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-673K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$250K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-422K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+554bps
Margin Improvement
$173K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$250K
Modeled Uplift
$170K
Risk-Adjusted
-$81K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$95K
+211bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$90K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$55K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+21bp
Total EBITDA Impact$250K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$87K$8K$95K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$90K$90K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$14K$41K$55K$173K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$24K$48K$71K$95K$95K$95K$95K
Cost to Collect$0$23K$45K$68K$90K$90K$90K$90K
A/R Days Reduction$0$18K$37K$55K$55K$55K$55K$55K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$70K$139K$204K$250K$250K$250K$250K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $250K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-673K$-673K-14.9%
Year 1$-693K+$167K$-526K-11.6%
Year 2$-714K+$250K$-463K-10.2%
Year 3$-735K+$250K$-485K-10.7%
Year 4$-757K+$250K$-507K-11.2%
Year 5$-780K+$250K$-530K-11.7%
$-6.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-5.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$903K
Value Created
$-530K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.1M
Organic Growth
$2.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-530K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$48K$71K$95K$114K
Cost to Collect$45K$68K$90K$109K
A/R Days Reduction$28K$41K$55K$66K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$125K$188K$250K$300K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 57 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-14.9%-13.5%-0.6%9.1%
P23
Net-to-Gross77.2%20.3%30.0%44.5%
P95
Occupancy60.4%21.3%36.3%69.0%
P66
Rev/Bed$174K$402K$537K$938K
P9
Exp/Bed$200K$357K$593K$1.0M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML