Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KNOXVILLE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KNOXVILLE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 443037 | TN | 57 beds | Current EBITDA $1.3M → Pro Forma $2.2M (+$887K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$887K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$647K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$887K
Modeled Uplift
$601K
Risk-Adjusted
-$286K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$337K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$334K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$205K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$887K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$337K$337K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$325K$9K$334K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$52K$153K$205K$647K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$84K$169K$253K$337K$337K$337K$337K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$83K$167K$250K$334K$334K$334K$334K
A/R Days Reduction$0$68K$137K$205K$205K$205K$205K$205K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$242K$483K$719K$887K$887K$887K$887K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $887K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.6x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x
9.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 10.0x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
10.0x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
11.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
12.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.3M$1.3M7.9%
Year 1$1.4M+$591K$2.0M11.6%
Year 2$1.4M+$887K$2.3M13.6%
Year 3$1.4M+$887K$2.3M13.8%
Year 4$1.5M+$887K$2.4M14.1%
Year 5$1.5M+$887K$2.4M14.4%
$13.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$26.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.4M
Value Created
$2.4M
Exit EBITDA
$2.1M
Organic Growth
$8.9M
RCM Value Creation
$2.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$169K$253K$337K$405K
Denial Rate Reductio$167K$250K$334K$401K
A/R Days Reduction$103K$154K$205K$246K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$443K$665K$887K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 64 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.9%-11.3%0.3%12.0%
P65
Net-to-Gross37.2%17.7%23.4%42.2%
P69
Occupancy54.0%30.8%63.3%81.0%
P36
Rev/Bed$296K$401K$549K$1.1M
P16
Exp/Bed$273K$355K$535K$1.1M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML