Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — QUILLEN REHABILITATION HOSPITAL A 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — QUILLEN REHABILITATION HOSPITAL A
CCN 443033 | TN | 31 beds | Current EBITDA $1.8M → Pro Forma $2.6M (+$738K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$738K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$537K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$738K
Modeled Uplift
$554K
Risk-Adjusted
-$184K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$280K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$278K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$170K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$738K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$280K$280K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$270K$8K$278K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$43K$127K$170K$537K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$70K$140K$210K$280K$280K$280K$280K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$69K$139K$208K$278K$278K$278K$278K
A/R Days Reduction$0$57K$114K$170K$170K$170K$170K$170K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$201K$402K$598K$738K$738K$738K$738K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $738K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x
9.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
10.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
11.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
12.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.8M$1.8M13.1%
Year 1$1.9M+$492K$2.4M17.0%
Year 2$1.9M+$738K$2.7M19.1%
Year 3$2.0M+$738K$2.7M19.5%
Year 4$2.1M+$738K$2.8M20.0%
Year 5$2.1M+$738K$2.9M20.4%
$18.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$31.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.1M
Value Created
$2.9M
Exit EBITDA
$2.9M
Organic Growth
$7.4M
RCM Value Creation
$2.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$140K$210K$280K$336K
Denial Rate Reductio$139K$208K$278K$333K
A/R Days Reduction$85K$128K$170K$204K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$369K$553K$738K$885K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.1%-13.5%-0.6%9.1%
P89
Net-to-Gross59.9%19.9%29.1%42.4%
P85
Occupancy93.5%23.7%42.1%68.4%
P97
Rev/Bed$452K$400K$549K$986K
P37
Exp/Bed$393K$352K$573K$1.0M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML