Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 443032 | TN | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $2.9M → Pro Forma $4.2M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$929K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$934K
Risk-Adjusted
-$340K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$484K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$479K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$295K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$484K$484K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$466K$13K$479K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$74K$220K$295K$929K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$121K$242K$363K$484K$484K$484K$484K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$120K$240K$359K$479K$479K$479K$479K
A/R Days Reduction$0$98K$196K$295K$295K$295K$295K$295K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$347K$694K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x
9.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
10.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.9M$2.9M12.1%
Year 1$3.0M+$849K$3.9M16.0%
Year 2$3.1M+$1.3M$4.4M18.1%
Year 3$3.2M+$1.3M$4.5M18.5%
Year 4$3.3M+$1.3M$4.6M18.9%
Year 5$3.4M+$1.3M$4.7M19.3%
$29.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$51.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$22.1M
Value Created
$4.7M
Exit EBITDA
$4.7M
Organic Growth
$12.7M
RCM Value Creation
$4.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$242K$363K$484K$581K
Denial Rate Reductio$240K$359K$479K$575K
A/R Days Reduction$147K$221K$295K$353K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$15K$19K
Total$637K$955K$1.3M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 74 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.1%-12.1%-0.7%9.3%
P82
Net-to-Gross66.0%18.7%27.8%41.0%
P95
Occupancy85.9%24.3%55.8%73.4%
P85
Rev/Bed$484K$380K$534K$986K
P41
Exp/Bed$426K$348K$521K$1.0M
P36

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML