Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 09:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 443031 | TN | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $385K → Pro Forma $1.3M (+$959K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$385K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$959K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$699K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$959K
Modeled Uplift
$682K
Risk-Adjusted
-$277K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$365K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$361K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$222K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$959K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$365K$365K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$351K$10K$361K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$56K$166K$222K$699K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$91K$182K$273K$365K$365K$365K$365K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$90K$180K$271K$361K$361K$361K$361K
A/R Days Reduction$0$74K$148K$222K$222K$222K$222K$222K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$261K$522K$778K$959K$959K$959K$959K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $959K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x88% / 23.4x92% / 26.4x97% / 29.4x99% / 30.9x100% / 32.3x
9.0x83% / 20.5x87% / 23.1x91% / 25.7x93% / 27.1x95% / 28.4x
10.0x78% / 18.1x83% / 20.5x87% / 22.8x89% / 24.0x91% / 25.2x
11.0x74% / 16.2x79% / 18.3x83% / 20.5x85% / 21.6x87% / 22.6x
12.0x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.5x79% / 18.5x81% / 19.5x83% / 20.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.1x
Headroom (turns)
63%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 63% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.4x, adding 6.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$385K$385K2.1%
Year 1$397K+$639K$1.0M5.7%
Year 2$409K+$959K$1.4M7.5%
Year 3$421K+$959K$1.4M7.6%
Year 4$433K+$959K$1.4M7.6%
Year 5$446K+$959K$1.4M7.7%
$3.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$15.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.6M
Value Created
$1.4M
Exit EBITDA
$613K
Organic Growth
$9.6M
RCM Value Creation
$1.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$182K$273K$365K$437K
Denial Rate Reductio$180K$271K$361K$433K
A/R Days Reduction$111K$166K$222K$266K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$479K$719K$959K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 74 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.1%-12.1%-0.7%9.3%
P58
Net-to-Gross60.4%18.7%27.8%41.0%
P93
Occupancy73.5%24.3%55.8%73.4%
P74
Rev/Bed$365K$380K$534K$986K
P23
Exp/Bed$357K$348K$521K$1.0M
P27

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML