Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REGIONAL ONE HEALTH EXTENDED CARE HO 2026-04-26 09:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REGIONAL ONE HEALTH EXTENDED CARE HO
CCN 442017 | TN | 30 beds | Current EBITDA $3.3M → Pro Forma $4.3M (+$952K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$952K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$694K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$952K
Modeled Uplift
$665K
Risk-Adjusted
-$287K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$362K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$358K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$220K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$952K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$362K$362K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$348K$10K$358K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$56K$165K$220K$694K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$90K$181K$271K$362K$362K$362K$362K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$90K$179K$269K$358K$358K$358K$358K
A/R Days Reduction$0$73K$147K$220K$220K$220K$220K$220K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$259K$518K$772K$952K$952K$952K$952K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $952K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.8x
9.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.0x
11.0x35% / 4.4x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
12.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.3M$3.3M18.4%
Year 1$3.4M+$634K$4.1M22.4%
Year 2$3.5M+$952K$4.5M24.8%
Year 3$3.6M+$952K$4.6M25.4%
Year 4$3.7M+$952K$4.7M26.0%
Year 5$3.9M+$952K$4.8M26.6%
$33.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$52.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$19.6M
Value Created
$4.8M
Exit EBITDA
$5.3M
Organic Growth
$9.5M
RCM Value Creation
$4.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$181K$271K$362K$434K
Denial Rate Reductio$179K$269K$358K$430K
A/R Days Reduction$110K$165K$220K$264K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$476K$714K$952K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.4%-13.5%-0.6%9.1%
P92
Net-to-Gross27.2%19.9%29.1%42.4%
P45
Occupancy65.7%23.7%42.1%68.4%
P69
Rev/Bed$603K$400K$549K$986K
P57
Exp/Bed$492K$352K$573K$1.0M
P44

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML