Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HOUSTON COUNTY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HOUSTON COUNTY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 441322 | TN | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $32K → Pro Forma $212K (+$180K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$3.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$32K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$180K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$212K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+571bps
Margin Improvement
$121K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$180K
Modeled Uplift
$112K
Risk-Adjusted
-$69K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.1M (vs $0.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$69K
+219bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$63K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$38K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+30bp
Total EBITDA Impact$180K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$61K$8K$69K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$63K$63K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$10K$29K$38K$121K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$17K$35K$52K$69K$69K$69K$69K
Cost to Collect$0$16K$32K$47K$63K$63K$63K$63K
A/R Days Reduction$0$13K$26K$38K$38K$38K$38K$38K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$51K$101K$147K$180K$180K$180K$180K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $180K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x116% / 46.8x121% / 52.3x125% / 57.9x127% / 60.6x129% / 63.4x
9.0x110% / 41.2x115% / 46.1x120% / 51.1x122% / 53.5x124% / 56.0x
10.0x106% / 36.8x110% / 41.2x115% / 45.6x117% / 47.9x119% / 50.1x
11.0x101% / 33.1x106% / 37.2x110% / 41.2x112% / 43.2x114% / 45.2x
12.0x98% / 30.1x102% / 33.8x106% / 37.5x108% / 39.4x110% / 41.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.2x
Headroom (turns)
81%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 81% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.3x, adding 7.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$32K$32K1.0%
Year 1$33K+$120K$153K4.8%
Year 2$34K+$180K$214K6.8%
Year 3$35K+$180K$215K6.8%
Year 4$36K+$180K$216K6.8%
Year 5$37K+$180K$217K6.9%
$317K
Entry EV (10x)
$2.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.1M
Value Created
$217K
Exit EBITDA
$51K
Organic Growth
$1.8M
RCM Value Creation
$217K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$35K$52K$69K$83K
Cost to Collect$32K$47K$63K$76K
A/R Days Reduction$19K$29K$38K$46K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$90K$135K$180K$216K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 56 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.0%-14.0%-0.8%9.2%
P55
Net-to-Gross27.9%20.2%29.8%45.7%
P43
Occupancy24.6%21.2%35.4%69.7%
P29
Rev/Bed$126K$401K$536K$950K
P7
Exp/Bed$125K$355K$573K$1.0M
P4

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML