Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HANCOCK COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 23:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HANCOCK COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 441313 | TN | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $-567K → Pro Forma $-180K (+$386K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 441313

HANCOCK COUNTY HOSPITAL
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$7.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-567K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$386K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-180K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+539bps
Margin Improvement
$275K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$386K
Modeled Uplift
$223K
Risk-Adjusted
-$163K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$146K
+204bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$143K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$87K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+13bp
Total EBITDA Impact$386K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$138K$8K$146K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$143K$143K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$22K$65K$87K$275K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT75.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$37K$73K$110K$146K$146K$146K$146K
Cost to Collect$0$36K$72K$108K$143K$143K$143K$143K
A/R Days Reduction$0$29K$58K$87K$87K$87K$87K$87K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$106K$213K$314K$386K$386K$386K$386K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $386K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-567K$-567K-7.9%
Year 1$-584K+$258K$-326K-4.6%
Year 2$-601K+$386K$-215K-3.0%
Year 3$-619K+$386K$-233K-3.3%
Year 4$-638K+$386K$-252K-3.5%
Year 5$-657K+$386K$-271K-3.8%
$-5.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.7M
Value Created
$-271K
Exit EBITDA
$-903K
Organic Growth
$3.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-271K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$73K$110K$146K$175K
Cost to Collect$72K$108K$143K$172K
A/R Days Reduction$44K$65K$87K$105K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$193K$290K$386K$464K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 10 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.9%-27.2%-4.4%2.4%
P40
Net-to-Gross46.2%32.6%45.3%75.9%
P50
Occupancy7.7%23.7%29.4%73.5%
P11
Rev/Bed$717K$277K$659K$1.5M
P50
Exp/Bed$773K$261K$784K$1.8M
P40

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML