Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MARSHALL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 15:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MARSHALL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 441309 | TN | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-8.2M → Pro Forma $-6.7M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$29.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-8.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-6.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$951K
Risk-Adjusted
-$599K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$589K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$583K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$358K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$589K$589K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$567K$16K$583K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$90K$268K$358K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$147K$295K$442K$589K$589K$589K$589K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$146K$292K$437K$583K$583K$583K$583K
A/R Days Reduction$0$119K$239K$358K$358K$358K$358K$358K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$422K$844K$1.3M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-8.2M$-8.2M-28.0%
Year 1$-8.5M+$1.0M$-7.4M-25.3%
Year 2$-8.7M+$1.5M$-7.2M-24.4%
Year 3$-9.0M+$1.5M$-7.4M-25.3%
Year 4$-9.3M+$1.5M$-7.7M-26.2%
Year 5$-9.5M+$1.5M$-8.0M-27.1%
$-82.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-87.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$-5.6M
Value Created
$-8.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-13.1M
Organic Growth
$15.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-8.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$295K$442K$589K$707K
Denial Rate Reductio$292K$437K$583K$700K
A/R Days Reduction$179K$269K$358K$430K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$19K$23K
Total$775K$1.2M$1.5M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 56 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-28.0%-14.0%-0.8%9.2%
P15
Net-to-Gross37.1%20.2%29.8%45.7%
P64
Occupancy16.4%21.2%35.4%69.7%
P13
Rev/Bed$1.2M$401K$536K$950K
P82
Exp/Bed$1.5M$355K$573K$1.0M
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML