Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ERLANGER BLEDSOE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ERLANGER BLEDSOE HOSPITAL
CCN 441306 | TN | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-144K → Pro Forma $745K (+$889K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-144K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$889K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$745K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$648K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$889K
Modeled Uplift
$545K
Risk-Adjusted
-$345K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$338K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$335K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$206K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$889K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$338K$338K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$325K$9K$335K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$52K$154K$206K$648K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$85K$169K$254K$338K$338K$338K$338K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$84K$167K$251K$335K$335K$335K$335K
A/R Days Reduction$0$69K$137K$206K$206K$206K$206K$206K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$242K$484K$721K$889K$889K$889K$889K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $889K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
8.1x
Headroom (turns)
125%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 125% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1.6x, adding 100.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-144K$-144K-0.9%
Year 1$-149K+$593K$444K2.6%
Year 2$-153K+$889K$736K4.4%
Year 3$-158K+$889K$731K4.3%
Year 4$-163K+$889K$726K4.3%
Year 5$-168K+$889K$722K4.3%
$-1.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$7.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.4M
Value Created
$722K
Exit EBITDA
$-230K
Organic Growth
$8.9M
RCM Value Creation
$722K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$169K$254K$338K$406K
Denial Rate Reductio$167K$251K$335K$402K
A/R Days Reduction$103K$154K$206K$247K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$445K$667K$889K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 56 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.9%-14.0%-0.8%9.2%
P47
Net-to-Gross17.4%20.2%29.8%45.7%
P11
Occupancy17.2%21.2%35.4%69.7%
P15
Rev/Bed$676K$401K$536K$950K
P66
Exp/Bed$682K$355K$573K$1.0M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML