Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TRUSTPOINT HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:18 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TRUSTPOINT HOSPITAL
CCN 440231 | TN | 18 beds | Current EBITDA $-388K → Pro Forma $2.3M (+$2.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$50.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-388K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$2.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Payer Diversity. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$619K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$33K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$979K$28K$1.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$156K$463K$619K$2.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$33K$33K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$254K$508K$763K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$252K$503K$755K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$206K$412K$619K$619K$619K$619K$619K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K
Cumulative$0$728K$1.5M$2.2M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
7.9x
Headroom (turns)
122%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 122% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1.4x, adding 100.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-388K$-388K-0.8%
Year 1$-400K+$1.8M$1.4M2.7%
Year 2$-412K+$2.7M$2.3M4.5%
Year 3$-424K+$2.7M$2.3M4.4%
Year 4$-437K+$2.7M$2.2M4.4%
Year 5$-450K+$2.7M$2.2M4.4%
$-3.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$24.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$28.4M
Value Created
$2.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-618K
Organic Growth
$26.7M
RCM Value Creation
$2.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$508K$763K$1.0M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$503K$755K$1.0M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$309K$464K$619K$742K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$24K$33K$39K
Total$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 40 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.8%-16.1%-0.8%9.2%
P49
Net-to-Gross29.1%20.6%30.8%42.6%
P42
Rev/Bed$2.8M$401K$576K$1.1M
P90
Exp/Bed$2.8M$390K$615K$1.2M
P95

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML